What is the difference between a man and a person?
A man is created in the image of the Almighty self-existing Creator of the Universe.
Man is endowed by his Creator with certain unalienable rights such as life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness and other property. To secure and protect man’s property, Governments (persons) are instituted among men (gentiles).
Man, being the creator of government is “in law”, whereas the offices created by government operate “at law”.
Natural vs. Artificial Persons
A Person is a man or woman with a duty or obligation within the context of a relationship.
If your brother has a kid, then you become an Aunt or Uncle whether you like it or not cause it’s natural and not optional – being a building inspector, firefighter, accountant or other artificial Person is optional.
We have a Right to be secure in all our Persons
==================
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
[Cf. – the legalese term Person appears to mean partnerships, joint-stock companies, trusts, estates, associations, corporations, partnerships, LLCs, agencies, municipalities, organizations, individuals and/or other legal or commercial entities of any kind – – – – click on the word Individual (adjective) and term INDIVIDUAL to see the difference between the both. In common English, an individual (adj) means one apple, one estate or one trust . . and . . in legalese, it appears to mean the combination of two singulars like one trust AND one estate.]
Governments are persons; a [wo]man with an obligation or specific duty according to the title they hold within that government.
Some persons have titles which more obviously carry specific duties such as sheriff, doctor, magistrate, senator, county prosecutor, building inspector, town manager etc…
Some persons have titles which do not so obviously carry specific duties or obligations such as teacher, employee, mother, father, student, participant, taxpayer, defendant, driver, citizen, fisherman, child etc …
A man or woman ACTING in these roles is sometimes referred to as a Natural Person, but never as [wo]man.
A legal fiction is a presumption of fact assumed by a court for convenience, consistency, or to achieve justice. A corporation is a common legal fiction, regarded in many jurisdictions as a “person” who has many of the same legal rights and responsibilities as a natural person.
I am here as a friend of the court to settle this matter as a man I believe a mistake has been made and I wish to remain in honor and I have been led to believe somebody is making a claim. Is there a claimant here today with a verified claim independently bonding this case, stating that I have done them a wrong?
Who is invoking the jurisdiction of this court today and when can I meet them? Where was, is the proper notice? Where is the warrant of attorney for the plaintiff’s representer? Where is the anti bribery statement? Where is the foreign registration certificate? Where are all of your oaths of office? What is the nature and cause of this proceeding? Who invoked the jurisdiction of this court? Who is the surety bringing the claim? Does one have a right to face his or her accuser? Where does the claimant live? Is the claimant a resident? Judge are you bringing a claim against I? Prosecutor, are you claiming I caused you a harm? Can one be a name? What evidence is before this court that I am liable for the name? Who is liable for the name? If I claim the name is that perjury? Can I go to jail for claiming something that I do not own? Can anyone here prove I own the name and am liable for it? Could it be the name belongs to the United States? Could it be that in order to have a controversy all parties must be properly identified? Where is the verified complaint from the claimant? Who do the charges apply to? Is a person a man? Is there a controversy before this court today? Is everyone in this court going to swear in today? Is this a court of record? When is the last time you spoke to the claimant? Has the claimant ever contracted covid? Does the claimant wear a mask like a good slave? Has the claimant been vaccinated yet? Has the claimant gotten his or her booster shots yet? When was the claimant born? Does the claimant have a phone number? Where is the claimant gainfully employed? Is the claimant a tax payer? Is the claimant a U.S. Citizen? Can the claimant hand write a notice? When did this court or the claimants representor have a meeting of the minds; what date; what time; what location? Does the claimant urinate standing up or sitting down? Does the claimant own a car? Does the claimant have a driver’s license? Does the claimant have a passport? Does the claimant have a social security number? Does the claimant have a duns number? Does the claimant have a birth certificate? Does the claimant have a mortgage? Does the claimant have a corporate charter? Has the claimants testicles dropped yet? Has the claimant reached the age of majority? Does the claimant have thoughts? Does the claimant have a voice? Is this an at law in rem proceeding? What do these alleged charges apply to? Can one pay a debt with a debt instrument? What specie is acceptable for payment? How much does a dollar weight? Dollars of what? What ISO number is used for this symbol $ and what does it mean? Do numerical numbers say anything? Is the English language an art form? All men are responsible for knowing the law but I ask are all men responsible for knowing legalese? Is a twisting of the language unbecoming of a judge? Is this an administrative qt law proceeding? If the officer is the witness then who and when was proper services of process issued? Who is primarily liable for all debts? Are all crimes commercial? Is it true that nothing can be tendered for a debt but gold and or silver? Judge is it true that he who deny principles there is no dispute? Judge is it true that he who speaks in contradictions shall not be heard? You see all of this nonsense could be avoided if the claimant’s/Plaintiff’s representation would just ring up his client and to expedite this court so as not to waste anymore time and as a man of honor I will gladly lend my phone to the claimants attorney so he may call his client, in good faith, with clean hands, as a man in honor wishing nothing more then to provide remedy to any claimant making a valid claim that I do, does, is causing them a harm!!!! . . . Or perhaps we could dismiss this case for want of prosecution, denial of due process, malicious prosecution, abortion of justice, fraud upon the court, false and fictitious claims using false and fictitious names with unverified claims with an absentee claimant, baratry, securities fraud, conspiracy, racketeering, collusion, etc….
What say you judgeepoo, have I given you enough reasons to shit yourself yet or should I go on??? Oh you don’t say that was not enough how about mixed war against the Constitution, treason, honest services fraud, unjust enrichment, breach of the public trust, judge are you paid by the claimant? How long have you and the prosecutor been fucking the good hard working American people over for under the guise of justice??? …. do you really need more Judge . . is it true that nobody has a name?
Lmao I can go on for months judge is it true that if you enter a plea on behalf of the name you bare full commercial and personal liability for use of that name? Judge who authorized you to enter a plea on behalf of that name? Where did you get the authority to do so? Is that considered practicing law from the bench? Is that an ethics violation? Yours truly Thee American badass!!
Hell even Johnny Cochran is rolling over in his grave right now. You know if the glove does not fit you must acquit! What say you judge is there a crime with out a body? Is this a civil matter or a criminal matter? If civil where is the contract? If criminal where is the claimant? If civil who has first hand perfected knowledge that I entered into the contract knowingly, willingly, and of my own free volition?
I require to depose the claimant, you know that silly little thing called due process of law ya I wish to invoke it . . lmfao.
I also require full disclosure, you know due process of the the inherent right to be fully informed.
It’s like my man kid rock says judge, it’s not cocky if you can back it up! Judge is it not true that an offer of tender of Payment made and refused liberates the alleged debtor??
Judge is it not true that if you mess with a bull you might some day catch the horns? Judge I have been lead to believe that if you live by the sword there may be a day one dies by the sword is that true? What say you, have I not given you all 99 reasons to walk away, just pick one or do you still wish to play??
Please enlighten me on what you think Trump has “really done”. I can tell you have no clue what he’s done.
I’ll start with, 1. He corrected his status at young age and became an American National (he’s not a Nationalist, like the media twisted it into, many people have no clue what that means, including you) took control of Cestui Que Vie Trust (which is where he got his million dollars to start his business, not from his father, like the media twisted it into, which you have no clue about), then because of that he doesn’t pay personal taxes (because taxes are voluntary, except for corporations acting in Interstate or Foreign Commerce, which you have no clue about) but his businesses pay “income” taxes.
2. That makes Trump, in-part, the first de jure President since Lincoln (which you have no clue about either).
3. The 3rd and final bankruptcy came to an end in 1999 which a man by the name of Russell J Gould (go look for WarCastles on YouTube to see how he saved the World from the NWO & Onumnuts) which because of that in 2012 ALL the Inc’s (United States Inc, United States of America Inc, USA Inc, etc, which you probably have no real clue about, I could be wrong on this one) were foreclosed on.
4. Now to talk about the other part about Trump being the first de jure President since Lincoln. The military was going to do a Coup d’état on Onumnuts, but Trump said he would run for Office and they could do it Lawfully. There’s so much here to try and explain, but you know what Trump has “really done” right?
5. After Trump won the election (despite all the voter fraud, and yes they are all about to get busted) Trump said at his Inauguration speech that he was “putting the power back into the peoples hands”. You remember that right, because you’ve been paying attention to what Trump has “really done” right?
6. Trump pulled us out of the TPPN right out of the gate (saved us $500.000.000/year) as well as pulled us out of a lot of other “bad deals”, like providing military support to other Countries and paying them Hundreds of not Millions of dollars a year. Started pulling our military out of Countries we shouldn’t have been in in the first place as well as renegotiated the terms of “if want our military protection you’re going to have to pay us”. He’s slowly pulled us out of the U.N.
7. Now this is where things start to get good. March 14, 2017 EO doing a complete audit of the entire Executive Branch and for 6 months asked for help from the people to report on any issues we thought needed to be “redressed” (because we redress our grievances with government, see 1st Amendment) (which is also how ultimately E~CLAUSE got created October 2017 (which is why I keep telling you and others that I REALLY know what’s going on because I’ve been a part of it since 2017).
8.PRESIDENTIAL MEMORANDA Presidential Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies Issued on: October 26, 2017 ALL NEWS SUBJECT: Temporary Certification for Certain Records Related to the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy (of course you know all about this right?)
9. Now for what Trump did next (which you’re fully aware of because you know what he has “really done” right?) First he reestablished the Rule of Law December 10, 2017 by Proclamation (hmmm right after the paperwork went in and E~Clause was created…hmm wonder what was in that practitioners judicial report?) The Declaration of Independence, Constitution of the united States of America 1787 with the Bill of Rights 1789 as the Bedrock of this Nation called America.
Then December 20 2017 by EO Declaring a state of emergency to block the property (civil asset forfeiture) of those involved in “Serious Human Rights Violations and Corruption” (which involves human trafficking both part a & b, but you know all about that too right?) WORLDWIDE
Then he came out in a press conference and said he was going after the World Child Pedophilia and going to wipe them off the Earth. A “fact sheet” March 13, 2018 “My Administration will focus on ending the absolutely horrific practice of human trafficking. And I am prepared to bring the full force and weight of our government, whatever we can do, in order to solve this horrific problem.
President Donald J. Trump” & in it he says “In February 2017, the President signed Executive Order 13773, “Enforcing Federal Law with Respect to Transnational Criminal Organizations and Preventing International Trafficking.””
Then March 1, 2018 he dug up an old EO from 1984 and made amendments to the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) and created the MCM (Manual for Courts Martial) Which all became effective January 1, 2019 (that’s why the deep state is scrapping their pants), Then this, Executive Order Regarding the Establishment of the Task Force on Market Integrity and Consumer Fraud LAW & JUSTICE Issued on: July 11, 2018
Then he went over to England and raided the Vatican I think it was 6 times and shut down the Vatican & London (if you have a clue what that even means, but you know what Trump has really done, right?) which is part of the Tri City States (D.C. being the 3rd) that have been in control of the money, birth certificates, Cestui Que Trust (since 1666) and said that we are going back to Natural Law and getting rid of both Constitutions (you would have to know the history of Law to know what he is talking about, but you know what Trump is really doing, right?).
Trump has also been working on taking down the International Banking Cartel (which is part of the Tri City States) and took control of the FED aka Federal Reserve and put it under the Department of Treasury (where our money belongs) and put the Secret Service in charge of Oversight and investigations (but you knew that already because you know what Trump is really doing, right?) Part of the other reorganization Trump put the DOJ in place for the people to report these criminals to, following due process of law and our Right to Redress our Greivences through the Legislature as well as the DOD with the MCM to try the treasonous criminals under Admiralty Jurisdiction like it says in the Constitution (but you knew that already because you know what Trump has really done, right?)
There’s a lot more that he’s done, but this is all off the top of my head except the 2 quotes and the JFK Assassination Document. I don’t think you quite know what you’re talking about, nor are you even close to having a clue what Trump has done and is doing to save the World while putting his and his families life on the line (many assassination attempts have been made)
He’s exposing the whole shit show and taking them down which is what JFK was trying to tell us and do and BUSH Senior and his commies assassinated him for (which is why him and Romney (correction it was John McCain) were sentenced to death by Military Tribunal, and you knew about that too, right?)
From David Straight in addition to a previous post of mine about what Trump is “really doing” as there is so much he has done and is doing not just for Americans but the whole world.
Turn off your Tell a Vision and watch the man live because the mainstream media cuts out certain parts after the live is over. I’ve busted the media on this when I went to share and discuss on my show live parts of what was said in the live video and was edited out. About 6 minutes worth was cut out overnight. Think about that.
———————————————-
HERE IS WHAT President Trump ACCOMPLISHED THIS WEEK but you probably won’t hear about it: BELOW THE WINS FOR THE CITIENS OF AMERICA ARE HUGE… -William J. Wagener
1. Made vaccines voluntary not mandatory. Military will check purity and distribute vaccines! )
2. Defunded W.H.O forever and wants an investigation into its operations.
3. Cancelled the Democrats HR 6666 bill, known as the Covid -19 TRACE Act that was the basis for Bill Gates’s diagnosis and tracking project, which was also cancelled.
4. Cancelled Bill Gates project known as ID2020 (MARK OF THE BEAST, PUT A CHIP INTO YOU TO TRACK FOREVER AND EVERY WHERE)
5. Opened a complaint platform to report censorship on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. <( It was overrun with complaints. They got the evidence. )>
6. Stopped 5G rollout nationwide and stopped Huawei
7. Executive Order to reopen states: Governors who refuse to reopen will be sued. FINALLY ! ! !
8. Executve Order for W.H. to take over all Electrical Grids: Which will include Internet servers, Broadcasting systems, Electronic systems. << Big Red Flag >>
9. Declares places of worship ‘Essential Sevices.’ Some mayors are fining people for going to church.
10. Applauded Australia and 116 countries for insisting on a China Probe into the spread of Covid-19 despite several threats from China about refusing critical exports
It has become increasingly dangerous to speak with anyone you don’t trust with your life.
How much little time do we have left to get well connected by alternate mean to those we trust to be there for us as the “STATE” escalates it’s programs against you.
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
I. All men are born equally free and independent; therefore, all government of right originates from the people, is founded in consent, and instituted for the general good.
II. All men have certain natural, essential, and inherent rights; among which arethe enjoying and defending life and libertyacquiring, possessing and protecting propertyand in a word, of seeking and obtaining happiness.
III. When men enter into a state of society, they surrender up some of their natural rights to that society, in order to insure the protection of others; and, without such an equivalent, the surrender is void.
IV. Among the natural rights, some are in their very nature unalienable, because no equivalent can be given or received for them. Of this kind are the rights of conscience.
V. Every individual has a natural and unalienable right to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience, and reason; and no subject shall be hurt, molested, or restrained in his person, liberty or estate for worshipping God, in the manner and season most agreeable to the dictates of his own conscience, or for his religious profession, sentiments or persuasion; provided he doth not disturb the public peace, or disturb others, in their religious worship.
VI. As morality and piety, rightly grounded on evangelical principles, will give the best and greatest security to government, and will lay in the hearts of men the strongest obligations to due subjection: and as the knowledge of these, is most likely to be propagated through a society by the institution of the public worship of the Deity, and of public instruction in morality and religion; therefore, to promote those important purposes, the people of this state have a right to impower, and do hereby fully impower the legislature to authorize from time to time, the several towns, parishes, bodies-corporate, or religious societies within this state, to make adequate provision at their own expence, for the support and maintenance of public protestant teachers of piety, religion and morality:
Provided notwithstanding, That the several towns, parishes, bodies-corporate, or religious societies, shall at all times have the exclusive right of electing their own public teachers, and of contracting with them for their support and maintenance.
And no portion of any one particular religious sect or denomination, shall ever be compelled to pay towards the support of the teacher or teachers of another persuasion, sect or denomination. And every denomination of christians demeaning themselves quietly, and as good subjects of the state, shall be equally under the protection of the law: and no subordination of any one sect or denomination to another, shall ever be established by law. And nothing herein shall be understood to affect any former contracts made for the support of the ministry; but all such contracts shall remain, and be in the same state as if this constitution had not been made.
VII. The people of this state, have the sole and exclusive right of governing themselves as a free, sovereign, and independent state, and do, and forever hereafter shall, exercise and enjoy every power, jurisdiction and right pertaining thereto, which is not, or may not hereafter be by them expressly delegated to the United States of America in Congress assembled.
VIII. All power residing originally in, and being derived from the people, all the magistrates and officers of government, are their substitutes and agents, and at all times accountable to them.
IX. No office or place whatsoever in government, shall be hereditarythe abilities and integrity requisite in all, not being transmissible to posterity or relations.
X. Government being instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the whole community, and not for the private interest or emolument of any one man, family or class of men; therefore, whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought, to reform the old, or establish a new government. The doctrine of non-resistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.
XI. All elections ought to be free, and every inhabitant of the state having the proper qualifications, has equal right to elect, and be elected into office.
XII. Every member of the community has a right to be protected by it in the enjoyment of his life, liberty and property; he is therefore bound to contribute his share in the expence of such protection, and to yield his personal service when necessary, or an equivalent. But no part of a mans property shall be taken from him, or applied to public uses, without his own consent, or that of the representative body of the people. Nor are the inhabitants of this state controllable by any other laws than those to which they or their representative body have given their consent.
XIII. No person who is conscientiously scrupulous about the lawfulness of bearing arms, shall be compelled thereto, provided he will pay an equivalent.
XIV. Every subject of this state is entitled to a certain remedy, by having recourse to the laws, for all injuries he may receive in his person, property or character, to obtain right and justice freely, without being obliged to purchase it; completely, and without any denial; promptly, and without delay, conformably to the laws.
XV. No subject shall be held to answer for any crime, or offence, until the same is fully and plainly, substantially and formally, described to him; or be compelled to accuse or furnish evidence against himself. And every subject shall have a right to produce all proofs that may be favorable to himself; to meet the witnesses against him face to face, and to be fully heard in his defence by himself, and counsel. And no subject shall be arrested, imprisoned, despoiled, or deprived of his property, immunities, or privileges, put out of the protection of the law, exiled or deprived of his life, liberty, or estate, but by the judgment of his peers or the law of the land.
XVI. No subject shall be liable to be tried, after an acquittal, for the same crime or offence. Nor shall the legislature make any law that shall subject any person to a capital punishment, excepting for the government of the army and navy, and the militia in actual service, without trial by jury.
XVII. In criminal prosecutions, the trial of facts in the vicinity where they happen, is so essential to the security of the life, liberty and estate of the citizen, that no crime or offence ought to be tried in any other county than that in which it is committed; except in cases of general insurrection in any particular county, when it shall appear to the Judges of the Superior Court, that an impartial trial cannot be had in the county where the offence may be committed, and upon their report, the assembly shall think proper to direct the trial in the nearest county in which an impartial trial can be obtained.
XVIII. All penalties ought to be proportioned to the nature of the offence. No wise legislature will affix the same punishment to the crimes of theft, forgery and the like, which they do to those of murder and treason; where the same undistinguishing severity is exerted against all offences; the people are led to forget the real distinction in the crimes themselves, and to commit the most flagrant with as little compunction as they do those of the lightest dye: For the same reason a multitude of sanguinary laws is both impolitic and unjust. The true design of all punishments being to reform, not to exterminate, mankind.
XIX. Every subject hath a right to be secure from all unreasonable searches and seizures of his person, his houses, his papers, and all his possessions. All warrants, therefore, are contrary to this right, if the cause or foundation of them be not previously supported by oath, or affirmation; and if the order in the warrant to a civil officer, to make search in suspected places, or to arrest one or more suspected persons, or to seize their property, be not accompanied with a special designation of the persons or objects of search, arrest, or seizure; and no warrant ought to be issued but in cases, and with the formalities prescribed by the laws.
XX. In all controversies concerning property, and in all suits between two or more persons, except in cases in which it has been heretofore otherwise used and practiced, the parties have a right to a trial by jury; and this method of procedure shall be held sacred, unless in causes arising on the high seas, and such as relate to mariners wages, the legislature shall think it necessary hereafter to alter it.
XXI. In order to reap the fullest advantage of the inestimable privilege of the trial by jury, great care ought to be taken that none but qualified persons should be appointed to serve; and such ought to be fully compensated for their travel, time and attendance.
XXII. The Liberty of the Press is essential to the security of freedom in a state; it ought, therefore, to be inviolably preserved.
XXIII. Retrospective laws are highly injurious, oppressive and unjust. No such laws, therefore, should be made, either for the decision of civil causes, or the punishment of offences.
XXIV. A well regulated militia is the proper, natural, and sure defence of a state.
XXV. Standing armies are dangerous to liberty, and ought not to be raised or kept up without the consent of the legislature.
XXVI. In all cases, and at all times, the military ought to be under strict subordination to, and governed by the civil power.
XXVII. No soldier in time of peace, shall be quartered in any house without the consent of the owner; and in time or war, such quarters ought not to be made but by the civil magistrate, in a manner ordained by the legislature.
XXVIII. No subsidy, charge, tax, impost or duty shall be established, fixed, laid, or levied, under any pretext whatsoever, without the consent of the people or their representatives in the legislature, or authority derived from that body.
XXIX. The power of suspending the laws, or the execution of them, ought never to be exercised but by the legislature, or by authority derived therefrom, to be exercised in such particular cases only as the legislature shall expressly provide for.
XXX. The freedom of deliberation, speech, and debate, in either house of the legislature, is so essential to the rights of the people, that it cannot be the foundation of any action, complaint, or prosecution, in any other court or place whatsoever.
XXXI. The legislature ought frequently to assemble for the redress of grievances, for correcting, strengthening and confirming the laws, and for making new ones, as the common good may require.
XXXII. The people have a right in an orderly and peaceable manner, to assemble and consult upon the common good, give instructions to their representatives; and to request of the legislative body, by way of petition or remonstrance, redress of the wrongs done them, and of the grievances they suffer.
XXXIII. No magistrate or court of law shall demand excessive bail or sureties, impose excessive fines, or inflict cruel or unusual punishments.
XXXIV. No person can in any case be subjected to law martial, or to any pains, or penalties, by virtue of that law, except those employed in the army or navy, and except the militia in actual service, but by authority of the legislature.
XXXV. It is essential to the preservation of the rights of every individual, his life, liberty, property and character, that there be an impartial interpretation of the laws, and administration of justice. It is the right of every citizen to be tried by judges as impartial as the lot of humanity will admit. It is therefore not only the best policy, but for the security of the rights of the people, that the judges of the supreme (or superior) judicial court should hold their offices so long as they behave well; and that they should have honorable salaries, ascertained and established by standing laws.
XXXVI. Economy being a most essential virtue in all states, especially in a young one; no pension shall be granted, but in consideration of actual services, and such pensions ought to be granted with great caution, by the legislature, and never for more than one year at a time.
XXXVII. In the government of this state, the three essential powers thereof, to wit, the legislative, executive and judicial, ought to be kept as separate from and independent of each other, as the nature of a free government will admit, or as is consistent with that chain of connection that binds the whole fabric of the constitution in one indissoluble bond of union and amity.
XXXVIII. A frequent recurrence to the fundamental principles of the Constitution, and a constant adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, industry, frugality, and all the social virtues, are indispensably necessary to preserve the blessings of liberty and good government; the people ought, therefore, to have a particular regard to all those principles in the choice of their officers and representatives: and they have a right to require of their law-givers and magistrates, an exact and constant observance of them in the formation and execution of the laws necessary for the good administration of government.
Feb 4th, 2020 – John Myser once again uses the public comment platform today to call out corruption with transcripts and police reports to support his allegations.
God uses that term person in 107 passages. The challenge for me became, what does God mean by that term person?
Etymologizing the person, I got a man with a mask—a false face.
Person comes from greek prosopon and Latin Persona—both meaning mask. If a man wears a mask, he is portraying or appearing as a fictional being. Man can’t be a fictional being, but he can “appear” as it.
The lawyers know the term person is a man with a mask (see words and phrases), and a man with a mask conceals his identity, and portrays a false identity. That is why in court you are summoned to “appear” as a man with mask, but people don’t know they are doing this because the fictional being has the same name as them.
Remember my presentation on Donald E Miller Jr., the most famous dead man alive?
That presentation proved his name was used to name two different beings, one alive and one dead.
God, is the God of the living, not the God of the dead, and in my opinion, a man wearing a mask, appearing in person, is a man alive portraying a dead fictional being, who is hiding his true nature from God. giving life to the dead.
Scott County Prosecutor Ron Hocevar knows a man is not a person. Ron knows it takes a man to appear as a person. Ron knows lawyers “deem” a man a person, and the “act of deeming” is to take what you know to be false and treat it as if it is true, or visa versa, take what you know to be false, and treat the falsehood as truth. It is evil in my opinion, and violates the 9th commandment.
I was in my 50’s before I figured this out, so yes I was deceived and didn’t know it. The word person is used everywhere so colloquially. I didn’t know what it really meant. I didn’t have the key of knowledge as lawyers do. Luke 11:52 See all the passages where God talks about Lawyers. He doesn’t talk about commissioners or police officers that way.
I would be willing to meet for a cup of coffee or lunch and share what I learned from scripture that caused me to see the deception and the truth.
“No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”
“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain, any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profitunder them, or either of them.”
“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain, any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”
No State, without the Consent of the united States, in congress assembled, shall send any embassy to, or receive any embassy from, or enter into any conferrence, agreement, alliance, or treaty, with any King prince or state; nor shall any person holding any office of profit or trust under the united states, or any of them, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state; nor shall the united states, in congress assembled, or any of them, grant any title of nobility.
“No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”
“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain, any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profitunder them, or either of them.”
31. The Legislature shall assemble for the redress of public grievancesand for making such laws as the public good may require. June 2, 1784
32. The People have a right, in an orderly and peaceable manner, to assemble and consult upon the common good, give instructions to their Representatives, and to request of the legislative body, by way of petition or remonstrance, redress of the wrongs done them, and of the grievances they suffer. June 2, 1784
The foundation for the Right to Redress are the Rights of Conscience and Self-Determination. The Right to Redress is secured by many Bills of Rights. In the Federal Constitution it’s in Article 1, and in New Hampshire, the Right to require Redress is secured at Articles 31, and the right to request Remonstrance at 32.
Click HERE to see the 2917 page Secretary of State’s Consolidated Petition Index filed between 1680 and 1819 by 200,000 Petitioners that were heard before the New Hampshire General Court. The hundreds of the Petitioners filed from 1819 thru the 1940’s are currently being added to this index.
These petitions were heard over the span of over 200 years and in reviewing the 100 or so that i looked at, I never saw a Petition or any Evidence showing any of these Petitions were “sponsored” by a Rep or Senator.
Every Petition i saw was laid upon the General Court by the hand of a man or woman, and some for these Petitions were simply Bills, hand written by women, seeking compensation to replace clothes or a horse lost in battle.
NH [Art.] 4. [Rights of Conscience Unalienable.] Among the natural rights, some are, in their very nature unalienable, because no equivalent can be given or received for them. Of this kind are the Rights of Conscience. June 2, 1784
NH [Art.] 10. [Right of Revolution.] Government being instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security, of the whole community, and not for the private interest or emolument of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government. The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind. June 2, 1784
NH [Art.] 32. [Rights of Assembly, Instruction, and Petition.] The People have a right, in an orderly and peaceable manner, to assemble and consult upon the common good, give instructions to their Representatives, and to request of the legislative body, by way of petition or remonstrance, redress of the wrongs done them, and of the grievances they suffer. June 2, 1784
==================================
=========================
======
Words to Know
Emolumentn. [L. emolumentum, from emolo, molo, to grind. Originally, toll taken for grinding. See Mill.]
1. The profit arising from office or employment; that which is received as a compensation for services, or which is annexed to the possession of office, as salary, feels and perquisites.2. Profit; advantage; gains in general.
Require, v.t. [L. requiro; re and quaero, to seek. See Query.]
1. To demand; to ask, as of right and by authority.We require a person to do a thing, and we require a thing to be done.Why then doth my lord require this thing? 1Chron. 21.
2. To claim; to render necessary; as a duty or any thing indispensable; as, the law of God requires strict obedience.
3. To ask as a favor; to request.I was ashamed to require of the king a band of soldiers and horsemen to help us against the enemy in the way. Ezra 8.[In this sense, the word is rarely used.]
4. To call to account for.I will require my flock at their hand. Ezek. 34.5. To make necessary; to need; to demand.The king’s business required haste. 1Sam. 21.6. To avenge; to take satisfaction for. 1Sam. 20.
1. To set right; to amend. In yonder spring of roses, find what to redress till noon.[In this sense, as applied to material things, rarely used.]
2. To remedy; to repair; to relieve from, and sometimes to indemnify for; as, to redress wrongs; to redress injuries; to redress grievances. Sovereigns are bound to protect their subjects, and redress their grievances.
3. To ease; to relieve; as, she labored to redress my pain.[We use this verb before the person or the thing. We say, to redress an injured person, or to redress the injury. The latter is most common.]
1. Reformation; amendment.For us the more necessary is a speedy redress of ourselves.[This sense is now unusual.]
2. Relief; remedy; deliverance from wrong, injury or oppression; as the redress of grievances. We applied to government, but could obtain no redress.There is occasion for redress when the cry is universal.
3. Reparation; indemnification. [This sense is often directly intended or implied in redress.]
4. One who gives relief.Fair majesty, the refuge and redress of those whom fate pursues and wants oppress.
2. Expostulation; strong representation of reasons against a measure, either public or private, and when addressed to a public body, a prince or magistrate, it may be accompanied with a petition or supplication for the removal or prevention of some evil or inconvenience. A party aggrieved presents a remonstrance to the legislature.
3. Pressing suggestions in opposition to a measure or act; as the remonstrances of conscience or of justice.
On Probable Cause, WHAT Evidence is required for a conviction, and why you should Shut Up!!!
Courts allow hearsay if not rebutted, and if you talk, anyone within earshot is now a witness and if you’re Nutz if you believe everyone will recall every word you said with any accuracy or if you believe they can read your mind and know what you meant or intended to say.
Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352 (1983) =“In sum, under the Fourth Amendment, police officers with reasonable suspicion that an individual has committed or is about to commit a crime may detain that individual, using some force if necessary, for the purpose of asking investigative questions. They may ask their questions in a way calculated to obtain an answer. But they may not compel an answer, and they must allow the person to leave after a reasonably brief period of time unless the information they have acquired during the encounter has given them probable cause sufficient to justify an arrest.” . . . “When law enforcement officers have probable cause to believe that a person has committed a crime, the balance of interests between the State and the individual shifts significantly, so that the individual may be forced to tolerate restrictions on liberty and invasions of privacy that possibly will never be redressed, even if charges are dismissed or the individual is acquitted.”
===
This page created April 27 2019 – I’ll add more on this when time allows
Stripped of their Citizenship was any Politician retaining any gift from any foreign power such as a publicly held company controlled by foreign investors. Such was the Campaign reform instituted by the Titles of Nobility Amendment ratified on December 10th, 1812 which became the Original 13th Amendment.
Here is the Language of the real (1812 Original) 13th Amendment
“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain, any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”
The following Google Book links are to the Original 13th Amendment as Ratified on December 9th, 1812.
It was published for 65 years in various State and Federal publications before the Elite were able to strip it from History – the first 2 links are to books that were published by congressional order of the United States of America.
As Seen at FINDLAW below, the 21st Amendment repealed the 18th Amendment on Prohibition . . yet both are still in the Law books.
However, the Original/Missing 13th Amendment was NEVER repealed, it simply went missing after over 60 years of publications in State Constitutions with No Explanation why.