27 Friday Sep 2019
Posted in Uncategorized
“It’s almost hard to believe that members of Congress had the chutzpah to establish a secret fund, paid for by taxpayers, to silence the victims of their unwanted sexual demands. But they did, once again proving their complete disregard for the people that pay their salaries.
And, the amount of money paid to silence their victims over the past two decades is staggering:”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
27 Friday Sep 2019
Posted in Uncategorized
Cool new word 🙂 – Diffidation: a renunciation of faith or allegiance : formal severing of peaceful relations.
===================
by professor
Hmmm – – recourse to arms ?
=========================
“If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion, or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. If there are any circumstances which permit an exception, they do not now occur to us.”
West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. Barnette [319 U.S. on p.642]
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/319/624/
====================
Read “English Common Law in the early American Colonies” (specifically Chapter IV – Summary) to understand how the New England settlers molded the American Common Law system based on their beliefs, and how they otherwise did abandon the technical system (SMU) of the English Common Law.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
=============================
~~~~~~~~
The Birth of the English Common Law
by Raoul Charles van Caenegem
~~~~~~~~
Diffidatio in French and English feudalism
by William Kluback
12 Thursday Sep 2019
11 Wednesday Sep 2019
Posted in Uncategorized
“If the Eleventh Amendment were intended to protect the states from all liability in suits by private parties (as Hans v. Louisiana suggested in 1890), it is poorly drafted to do so: there would be no need to recite that citizens of other states, and of foreign states, are the parties barred. Instead, the technical language of the Amendment tracks the language of the “state-party-based” head of jurisdiction in Article III, suggesting it was narrowly targeted at removing the specific basis for jurisdiction under which the Court decided Chisholm v. Georgia (1793), and under which all then-pending suits against states (including Massachusetts) appear to have been . . . “
Learn More at
on Wednesday and Friday nights,
at 7:30pm Eastern / 4:30pm Pacific time
or on Zoom with your phone
by dialing 929-436-2866,
and then entering
Meeting ID 848 973 346 #
at the prompt
===============
Other Links of Interest
E-Clause on YouTube
E-Clause on Facebook (Zoom Videos)
E-Clause – -> FaceBook Documents Page
E-Clause – – – – -> R4D Documents Page
Kirk’s Law Corner FaceBook Study Group (Files and Documents)
Kirk’s Law Corner R4D Documents Page
Kirk’s Law Corner FaceBook Page (Videos)
Kirk’s Law Corner YouTube Channel
07 Saturday Sep 2019
Posted in Uncategorized
Increasingly, it looks like the political fight isn’t between Republicans and Democrats, but rather the American people against the Deep State. More and more often we are seeing bureaucrats, lobbyists, and elected officials of both parties circle the wagons so to say in an effort to prevent any true reforms of our government.
While we the American people may believe the government isn’t working, for an elite group embedded throughout our government and media, the government is working quite well — for them!
So, how did this come to be in a nation that’s founding document begins with “We the People”? For a take on the development of the Deep State and what it represents, we turn to Joost Meerloo in his seminal book The Rape of the Mind.
Presciently, in his discussion of the Deep State or the “administrative machine” published in 1956, Meerloo states,
“The burning psychological question is whether man will eventually master his institutions so that these will serve him and not rule him.”
Here’s how he describes the rise of the Deep State:
Read Full Article Here
or via the PDF below
=====
