These pages contain no thing more than the beliefs ‘we’, “man”, currently hold
the actual American Common Law
the Pre-Constitutional Rights of man[kind] as described in “English Common Law in the early American Colonies” by Paul Samuel Reinsch (1899 – an absolute must read).
A better understanding of Liberty, Freedom
Natural Common Law
will come to you when you know the difference between
“Legalese” (foreign copy-written language)
“TERMS AND PHRASES” as defined in Black’s Law Dictionary
English “words” (common parlance) as defined by Noah Webster (1828)
To better understand Health and Law, it’s imperative to know the difference between PERSONS subject to the Legalese Codes and Statutes (opinions of man by way of contract) and “man”[kind] (w/o contract) which is only subject to the Natural Law.
DO NOT MISCONSTRUE
West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. Barnette [319 U.S. 642]“If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion, or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. If there are any circumstances which permit an exception, they do not now occur to us.”
We discuss our beliefs during “live” Q &A’s on
Talkshoe at R4D Word Nerdz
~ ~ ~
To Join the Live Chat:
1) Dial (605) 562-0444
2) enter Call ID: 94 023 87#
3) enter 1 # and join as guest
Click HERE to listen Live on your computer,
or to listen to, or download past shows/episodes
~ – ~ – ~
Notice: Past Episodes from Talkshoe ID 134084
will be back ”on-line” by October 7th
~ – ~
Check back soon for updates
Tuesdays we discuss “Hands on Healing” with Jeff and Dana
~ ~ ~
Wednesdays – Common Law Shamanism with “JC” and “The Shawman”
Saturdays – Shon Mann leads us in bible study on “Rock in the Word“
Always at 9pm Eastern, 8pm Central, 7pm Mountain and 6pm Pacific
We do these shows to answer questions, so please speak up if you have any – Q & A’s are what make the shows most interesting.
Thank y’all for joining us on the calls and for helping us get the word out so we can all learn together.
~ ~ ~
“Live” and archived shows are accessible HERE
Learning the underlying doctrines of real law is a lifestyle that will serve you for the rest of your days . . it is not an easy fix for your current issue, so if all you seek is a “Silver Bullet” or some magic words or secret potions (templates) . . you might as well just pack it up and move onto some Guru that will steal you blind while you go back to your “Monday Night Football” or “Dancing with the Stars” . . but if you’re ready to implement a change of attitude (lifestyle), then get ready for the long haul because you are about to become very frustrated . . fortunately, there are many people that are willing to help you all over Skype, FaceBook and WhatApp.
Technical knowledge (brain) is a relatively small percentage of what makes up the foundations of the American Common Law way of life you seek to implement, attitude (heart) makes up a large percentage, and the rest is based on intuition (gut) which you will quickly learn to trust and develop based on your perceptions of right and wrong, so it is safe to say that you better learn pretty quickly how to follow your gut instead of your heart or your head (Jeremiah 31:31-34).
~ ~ ~
Here’s the short list of things to do to get started
~ ~ ~
First, read “English Common Law in the early American Colonies” (specifically Chapter IV – Summary) to understand how the New England settlers molded the American Common Law system based on their beliefs, and how they otherwise did abandon the technical system of the English Common Law.
~ ~ ~
Second, learn the difference between English words found in an English Dictionary and “LEGALESE” terms found in a dictionary of legal “terms and phrases” . . They both look like English, but legalese is actually a copy-written foreign language that only a “person” with a license to practice “law” has the authority to use. ‘i’ further believe man can only be held accountable to laws written in the common language he understands and that only Person’s with the knowledge of and authority to use legalese can be held accountable to CODES, STATUTES, ORDINANCES etc…
Example: Law is black and white = “Thou shalt not murder“
Code/Statute is the gray area created by attorney’s to allow the most amount of controversy possible giving said attorney’s as many ways to earn a living by extracting your wealth as possible.
THEY take the 4 words of God’s black and white law above and twist it into every imaginable contortion they can so that even THEY argue about what it all means while YOU pay THEM to watch the show about how great of a “plea deal” they’re going to offer you before you have even exercised your Pre-Constitutional Right to meet your accuser “Face to Face“.
To better understand why lawyers were tarred and feathered in colonial days, read the conclusions Chapter of that red book above.
~ ~ ~
Third, connect to “common law” Facebook, Skype and WhatsApp groups and with other folks who seek the same knowledge and wisdom you seek. There are dozen’s of these groups and many focus on specific subjects like traffic, CPS, property tax issues etc . . .
~ ~ ~
Fourth, learn about “STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION” (that gray area) and the history and true meaning of the words you use as well as punctuation or you will never know how to write like a “[wo]man” nor will you ever know what is really going on around you.
For example, click on the following words to see if you know their history, what these words really mean and the difference between their use as a verb, noun, adjective, pronoun etc… claim, nice, argue, smart, require, trespass, wrong …
Learn what a PERSON is and read about this most important concept for man to acquire knowledge of if he is ever to be free.
Compare the following until you can teach the difference to another man.
words vs. terms (Webster’s vs. Black’s)
claim vs. complaint
require vs. request
man aggrieved vs. petitioner, claimant
notice vs. motion, pleading, petition
interfere vs. interference
wrongdoer vs. defendant, respondent
~ ~ ~