Here’s an archive link to one of my favorite sites
In an effort to find the common law thread that runs through all Law, ‘i’ve studied Statutes and Codes on and off for 15 years in an attempt to find a way out of the Administrative “LAW” venues we all get sucked into.
Thus 4 years ago, when ‘i’ began this website, ‘i’ decided to focus mostly on the common law as taught by Karl Lentz so that new folks reading and listening to the Talkshoe shows would not be confused as they began their journey into understanding the difference between the LEGALESE used in Courts, and the English language and Common Law Principles used by “man” and the pre Constitution settlers of America ;
This morning, someone in the Word Nerdz skype group asked me if he could push that conversation a little further outside of it’s common law boundaries in search of deeper answers and the following is my answer:
Most folks herein are now well aware of what is and is not common to “man”‘ and thus ‘i’ no longer have much concern about confusing anyone . . in fact, looking at Statutes, Codes and other Legalese BS over the years is what ‘i’ did to uncover the common law thread that ran thru them . . ‘i’ however discovered most were void of standing in a common law venue and thus none had jurisdiction over “man” and his kind.
I believe it is the exercise of examining all things, similar to a Jury’s duty to “Try-All” facts/evidence, to be the best way for us all to grasp the underlying Doctrines of Law (that common thread) and to otherwise realize how void most LEGALESE Statutes and Codes are due to their being written in a language no common man can understand.
You need only look at New-Hampshire’s RSA 21 to see the full blend of Legalese BS injected into every Code, Statute or Ordinance created by the BAR society.
For instance, when you look at 21:2 Common Usage. – Words and phrases shall be construed according to the common and approved usage of the language; but technical words and phrases, and such others as may have acquired a peculiar and appropriate meaning in law, shall be construed and understood according to such peculiar and appropriate meaning.
. . . it’s easy to perceive above 1) how the blend of English words and LEGAL TERMS has corrupted every statute as far as it’s applicability to ‘mankind’, and 2) how these Codes can be ONLY be administered against BAR qualified interpreters of said Code who actually are trained in the language of LEGALESE, and 3) how an American “man” can NOT be held accountable to a “LAW” which is written in a language he does not speak . . i.e. Chinese, Cantonese, Portuguese, Legalese etc . .
Another great example of this LEGALESE BS is 21:9 Person. – The word “person” may extend and be applied to bodies corporate and politic as well as to individuals.
Ask yourself –
1) where does this term PERSON “extend” from?
2) and what is meant by “individuals” ?
We [wo]man get in the deepest shit when we ASSume “individuals” means an individual “man” . . . a belief ‘i’ gave up years ago . . . ‘i’ believe one of the “bodies” corporate and one of the “bodies” politic is what is meant by the terms “individuals” . . but then again, ‘i’ only trained in English and ‘i’ did fail that subject in my senior year of High School whereby ‘i’ did graduate only by the sympathy expressed by my English teacher after she told me she was well aware of my diligent efforts but that she felt even summer school would not help me . . . LOL
So David . . YES . . let’r rip . . post what you wish so long as the conversation is always geared to discovering those ancient underlying principles of the law common to “mankind” that are still secured by the 9th Article of the US Bill of Rights — “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”
. . . and while we’re at it . . let’s all read the “The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America”
. . . that we may remember the only legit purpose of government is to secure the rights of “man”.
“. . . We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.– That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. . . . “
. . . finally, let us remember that without our (the Jury) consent . . THEY have nothing
Why is it that the Government expects a Jury to hold us accountable to hundreds of thousands of pages of ‘”THEIR”‘ Codes, Statutes and Ordinances which are written in the foreign language of “Legalese” as soon as we get out of School when Government schools do NOT teach the foundations or doctrines of law ?
Why . . . Simple ;-(
. . . . to make YOU, easy pickings for the Government
YOU, are the Cash Cow, and the more ignorant you are, the better
Heaven forbid you should ever figure out you are an “idiot” (literally “private person” as opposed to one taking part in public affairs) and not subject to THEIR private Corporate regulations without YOUR consent, . . . and that you have a right to “face your accuser” (Acts 25:16), . . . and that there must be verifiable damages incurred by the accuser for a case or trespass to even exist.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
If Our children do not know the relevance of these things, then We have failed to secure for them a proper Education.
Campaign Finance Reform? Is a Corporation, controlled by foreign investors, a “Foreign Power” as described in the 1812 ORIGINAL 13th Amendment?
Is that why the 13th Amendment disappeared after 60 years of being published as Law?
Was the Civil War used as a “False Flag” event?
Could Lincoln have ended Slavery with an Executive Order?
What was the war really about?
The 1812 ORIGINAL 13th Amendment:
“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain, any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.“
To Clarify: “If any citizen … shall … accept and retain any present … of any kind whatever, from any … foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office … “
Why were hundreds of books written about something that supposedly never happened? Click HERE to see all those Google Books results.
The 1812 ORIGINAL/missing 13th Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America was fully Ratified in December 1812 upon the New~Hampshire Legislature’s approval it. It was published in hundreds of articles and law books for another 60 years and then Vanished without a trace.
Published as LAW by the United States and the Several states from 1813 to the late 1870’s and then . . . pooooof . . . gone . . Why ? ? ?
If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain, any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.
The Screenshot below is of the
Click ON the Screenshot to see it on Google Books
The next 2 links are to books that were published by a congressional order of the United States of America
See Volume 1, Page 74
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1825 – Military Laws of the United States: To which is prefixed the Constitution of the United States
See page 16
I believe from the sheer amount of Volume in the printing of this Amendment for 60 years in Various Law books, that it most certainly ratified dispute the supposed “missing papers” from Virginia.
If Esquire John Quincy Adams’ 1818 report (seen below) was conclusive, then why did the United States include the Original 13th in their 1825 Army Field Manual of the Laws of the United States?
Pictured below are some of the book that can be found at the Connecticut State Repository which contain the Missing 13th Amendment.
Click HERE to See the “Show Time” in your Time Zone
I did this show pretty much every Wednesday from June 2014 to the end of 2015.
I did a call last week just to reconnect with friends and had such a great time I decided to do one more tomorrow night – and then I’m going to disconnect again for awhile.
Passing this on in case you know of any Californians who can use this….
If you know someone who has been displaced because of the fires, please get in touch with Stephanie St James.
Here’s what she said:
I have apartments in Petaluma, Vacaville, Benicia and Martinez available immediately for people in need.
•Immediate move-in to any ready apartment
•Waived application fees
•Waived security deposit (or additional deposit for pets)
•Credit will not play a factor in a person’s ability to reside•We will waive our 30-day move-out notice requirement
•No maximum occupancy guidelines
•No renters insurance requirement
•Free/Reduced rental pricing
•Pets: No breed restrictions, no number of pet restrictions
If you can, please use the email address,
they’re getting swamped with requests!
This is what they need to know:
5)# of people
6) # of pets
7)Were you a renter or owner
8)lose your home or just evacuated
9)want long term or short term
These are the kind of owners California needs.
Recently, a criminal complaint and petition was filed in the District Court of New Jersey, Trenton Division accusing District Court Judge Freda L Wolfson of obstruction of justice and requesting the release of a federal prisoner, based on the contention that the judge had no authority to sentence anyone to jail. Judges are presumed to know the law or where to find it.
In prepared remarks by Attorney General Jeff Sessions on September 5, 2017, Sessions stated: “As the Attorney General, it is my duty to ensure that the laws of the United States are enforced and that the Constitutional order is upheld. No greater good can be done for the overall health and well-being of our Republic, than preserving and strengthening the impartial rule of law. Societies where the rule of law is treasured are societies that tend to flourish and succeed.”
The petitioner, David Moleski, a former chiropractor and pilot from Neptune, New Jersey, claims he was falsely imprisoned when the judge in his criminal trial on mail fraud and wire fraud charges, sentenced him to 54 months in prison, followed by five years of supervised release, as well as a $10,000 fine and more than $48,000 in restitution. Because of the false imprisonment, Moleski’s lawyers requested the immediate release of their client.
The argument presented in the complaint suggests that Judge Wolfson obstructed justice pursuant to 18 USC § 1512, et. seq., because she knew in advance that she had no authority to “prosecute, adjudge, or imprison” Moleski. Attorneys for Moleski and other social justice groups thoroughly researched the issue and found that the law granting District Court Judges the authorization to send any defendants in any criminal case to prison is invalid because the bill that passed the house in 1947 did not match the one that passed the Senate in 1948.
If Public Law 80-772 is indeed not valid, then Moleski and presumably thousands of other prisoners, were sent to prison illegally. This is a very serious issue because it would mean that no federal judge currently has authorization to sentence anyone accused of a federal crime to prison; it would call into question any criminal case in which a a person convicted of a federal crime was sentenced to incarceration.
President Truman “signed” Public Law 80-772 into law on June 25, 1948. Thus ostensibly rewrote Title 18 of the United States Code. However a different bill passed the House in 1947 than passed the Senate in 1948, rendering that law unconstitutional. Until the Senate and the House pass the EXACT SAME BILL and the bill is signed by the President or the bill is not signed and becomes law without signature because BOTH houses passed the bill, there is no law.
Just because the House of Representatives voted to pass a law does not make it an enforceable law without passage from the Senate as well. So all you had is a bill passed by the House in 1947 and a different one passed by the Senate in 1948 and then they have to get together and negotiate a combined or compromised law for passage of both houses before it can become law or the law dies.
See Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution. Title 18 also also includes 18 U.S.C. § 4081 and 18 U.S.C. § 4082, which authorizes the transfer of a federal criminal judgement from the U.S. District Court to the Department of Justice and then from the Department of Justice to the Bureau of Prisons.
However, 18 USC 4081 and 4082 are not in the Statutes at Large, and do not exist as a matter of law. No transfer of a judgement is possible, rendering any imprisonment impossible. Researchers looked at numerous memos from House and Senate Clerks, and they all confirmed that the bill that passed the House on May 12, 1947 was different from the one that passed the Senate in June 1948 and went to Truman’s desk.
According to the argument in the complaint, P.L. 80-772 positively repealed the previous laws granting jurisdiction to district court judges, which means District Court Judges effectively have no jurisdiction to either classify defendants in the Bureau of Prisons or to hold them at all. In other words, based on their research, even if a judgement was considered valid, judges have no authority to send anyone to prison.
The recent complaint makes the claim that Judge Wolfson’s acceptance of indictments and the issuance of orders in Moleski’s case are legally void and thus constitute obstruction of justice because 18 U.S.C. § 3231 was never legally passed by Congress and neither 18 U.S.C. § 4081 nor 18 U.S.C. § 4082 are valid sections of the statutes at large.
In addition, they claim the denial of the Motion to Dismiss on Sept. 13, 2014 filed by Moleski in Moleski’s’s case is obstruction of justice because both the House and the Senate failed to properly pass the same version of P.L. 80-772. Wolfson is presumed to know that.
This is not entirely a new argument. As early as 2008, the Bureau of Prisons received a large volume of Requests for Administrative Relief because of the claim that no law currently exists that grants jurisdiction to District Court Judges to transfer those convicted of a crime to prison.
In 2008 Harley Lappin, then head of the Bureau of Prisons asked the number 2 person in the Department of Justice to investigate the claims. The Department of Justice advised him that the 18 U.S.C. § 3231 is unconstitutional.
If the argument holds, it has the potential to affect a great many current and former federal prisoners, from both the United States and foreign countries. (The several States of the Union?)
SIT – STAND or “Take a Knee” ?
For years, due to a controversy that boiled within, I made myself scarce during Pledge/Anthem events, but I no longer plan to do so now that I’ve taken the time to gain new insights into the words instead of being so focused on the BS cycle of mindless indoctrination I got at school about “Democracies”.
It’s unfortunate I wasn’t taught the true nature of these things in school, but then the replacement of critical thinking with mindless indoctrination is almost complete since they gutted the Bill of Rights of so many States in the late 50’s. See New Hampshire’s original “Article 6” before it was gutted in 1958.
The Pledge is to the “Flag” (jurisdiction) of the united States of America and it’s Republic – NOT to the “UNITED STATES” DEMOCRACY . . !!!!!!
It’s not a pledge to DEMOCRACY (mob rule) but to the Republic (individual rights). A Republic is as close to personal freedom and self-governance (Anarchism) as any social contract will ever be.
The American National Anthem is about the ideals of this Republic and the Fight and Perseverance (the blood, sweat and tears) it took to establish those ideals.
It’s unfortunate that so many “men” who mindlessly repeat those words have so little fight left in them to stand up to the threat of DEMOCRACY within this Republic . . . but then what are we to expect from “men” who go to “Church” at a 26 USC 501(c)(3) Tax Exempt Corporation controlled by the likes of the IRS who threaten to put them out of business if they do not respect the “Separation of Church and State” . . LMFAO
Men who prefer to watch endless Sports or Bass Fishing and who prefer to drink beer or do drugs, and to otherwise numb them selves and kiss Gov ass to keep their chains at any cost to avoid all responsibilities to be Fathers and to educate their issue (kids) about life, respect and what we use to call The American Way
Due to this internal conflict, I had chosen years ago not to associate myself with such clueless wonders, and even though it tears me apart to know most “men” continue to chose ignorance, I now chose to stand alone in their midst in support of My beliefs, cus I do stand for This Republic and against its DOMESTIC enemies.