The “Right To Travel” is not ONLY about
Click HERE to know how deep this issue goes.
Start by reading Shapiro v. Thompson 394 U.S. 618
This Court long ago recognized that the nature of our Federal Union and our constitutional concepts of personal liberty unite to require that all citizens be free to travel throughout the length and breadth of our land uninhibited by statutes, rules, or regulations which unreasonably burden or restrict this movement. That [p630] proposition was early stated by Chief Justice Taney in the Passenger Cases, 7 How. 283, 492 (1849):
“The constitutional right to travel from one State to another . . . has been firmly established and repeatedly recognized.” United States v. Guest, 383 U.S. 745“] 383 U.S. 745, 757.”
“This constitutional right, which, of course, includes the right of “entering and abiding in any State in the Union,” 383 U.S. 745, 757.”
“This constitutional right, which, of course, includes the right of “entering and abiding in any State in the Union,” Truax v. Raich, 239 U.S. 33, 39, is not a mere conditional liberty subject to regulation and control under conventional [p643] due process or equal protection standards. [n1]”
[T]he right to travel freely from State to State finds constitutional protection that is quite independent of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Read/Download “No Law Requires You To Record Pledge Your Private Automobile” to see more Supreme Courts opinions on this subject. (I have yet to verify each case site therein)
Join us Wednesdays and Saturdays at 9pm EST
on Common Law Word Nerdz to learn more