The Bills of (property) Rights of the Several States, are Self-Evident Declaratory Statements made by the Peoples of those States, to set the boundaries of government, and to primarily instruct said governments in the formation and execution of the laws necessary for Government (sub-contractor) to secure said Rights/Property, which is their ONLY legitimate function.
Pre-Constitutional Rights, such as the Rights of Conscience (Art 4), and The Right to Face Your Accuser, as well as The Right to a Mixed Jury and The Right to Jury Nullification (consent) are no where to be found in the Declaration of Independence, The Articles of Confederation, nor in it’s amended Constitution for a more perfect union and it’s Bill of Rights.
These Rights however are self-evident and un-a-lien-able:
New Hampshire [Art.] 4. [Rights of Conscience Un-a-lien-able.] Among the natural rights, some are, in their very nature unalienable, because no equivalent can be given or received for them. Of this kind are the Rights of Conscience.
June 2, 1784
See Jeremiah 31:31-34 for clarification
[Art.] 38. [Social Virtues Inculcated.] A frequent recurrence to the fundamental principles of the constitution, and a constant adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, industry, frugality, and all the social virtues, are indispensably necessary to preserve the blessings of liberty and good government; the people ought, therefore, to have a particular regard to all those principles in the choice of their officers and representatives, and they have a right to require of their lawgivers and magistrates, an exact and constant observance of them, in the formation and execution of the laws necessary for the good administration of government.
June 2, 1784
Our Rights of Conscience are also acknowledged by our accusers in Article 9 of the Federal Bill of Rights as well is in many other of the constitutions of the ‘several” States
In the sub-tabs of this page, we’ll identify the foundations of these and many others Rights which can be used to Tame or to entirely De-Tooth the Dragon which Ass-u-me(s) jurisdiction over the ignorant (thru consent/contract), to steal, kill and to destroy.
Our focus is on the licenses/privileges (teeth) and how we, ‘man'(kind), consent to these contracts out of fear of the local bogie-man currently acting under “color of law” in our neighborhoods.
To Be Free:
I believe we need to withdraw, rescind, and revoke our consent
to these contracts/licenses as well as to their affiliated
Executive Branch Court proceedings,
and I believe we must require to proceed
only in accord to the law of the land
i.e. . . “the mind of God, as revealed in His Word”
FYI – some of these sub-tabs are older pages i slid over from elsewhere on the site so they are in need of updates . . please feel free to comment on the updates you seek on on resources to help us better understand these specific Rights.
Thank you for your support.
For the Curious = Flying Monkeys Denied
Essentially, it’s all about Property;
Self-Evident Rights are based in Natural Law which is considered to be so fundamental that it can not be the subject of legislation. Some of these rights include the ‘Right To Travel‘ and the ‘Right To Face Your Accuser‘.
As time allows, i will add sub-tabs herein about these Natural Rights and Property. Thank you all for your support of and contributions to these pages.
Click HERE to read more about Property
Thank you Mark Passio
All Rights are Property, there are no exceptions. We find this idea about property in The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united State of America – 1776 wherein we read;
‘i’ believe that life, liberty, happiness and even the “right to pursue” are all property.
Natural Law is Inherent, Pre-Existing and Self-Evident
A man or woman must have been harmed or their property injured for a violation of Natural Law to have taken place. Any ACTION which does not cause harm to a man or woman or injury to their property is a RIGHT.
West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. Barnette [319 U.S. 642]“If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion, or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. If there are any circumstances which permit an exception, they do not now occur to us.”