De-toothing the Dragon

The Bills of Rights (property) of the Several States are Self-Evident Declaratory Statements made by the People as the primary instructions in the formation of the Government which ONLY exist to secure that Property know as “the Rights of man” .

Pre-Constitutional Rights, such as the Rights of Conscience (Art 4), and The Right to Face Your Accuser, as well as The Right to a Mixed Jury and The Right to Jury Nullification (consent) are no where to be found in the Declaration of Independence, The Articles of Confederation, nor in it’s amended Constitution for a more perfect union and it’s Bill of Rights.

These Rights however are self-evident and un-a-lien-able:

New Hampshire [Art.] 4. [Rights of Conscience Un-a-lien-able.] Among the natural rights, some are, in their very nature unalienable, because no equivalent can be given or received for them. Of this kind are the Rights of Conscience.
June 2, 1784

These Rights are also acknowledged by our accusers in Article 9 of the Federal Bill of Rights as well is many of the constitutions of the ‘several” States

In the sub-tabs of this page, we’ll identify the foundations of these and many others Rights which can be used to Tame or to entirely De-Tooth the Dragon which Ass-u-me(s) jurisdiction over the ignorant (thru consent/contract), to steal, kill and to destroy.

Our focus is on the licenses/privileges (teeth) and how we, ‘man'(kind), consent to these contracts out of fear of the local bogie-man currently acting under “color of law” in our neighborhoods.

To Be Free:
I believe we need to withdraw, rescind, and revoke
our consent to these contracts/licenses as well as to
their affiliated Executive Branch Court proceedings,
and I believe we must require to proceed only in accord to
Article III Courts of  Common Law

FYI – some of these sub-tabs are older pages i slid over from  elsewhere on the site so they are in need of updates . . please feel free to comment on the updates you seek on on resources to help us better understand these specific Rights.

Thank you,
Gus
greyursk@gmail.com

For now, to get a better idea of where we’re going with this page,
check out

Flying Monkeys Denied

The Banana Video

Essentially, it’s all about Property;

Self-Evident Rights are based in Natural Law which is considered to be so fundamental that it can not be the subject of legislation. Some of these rights include the ‘Right To Travel‘ and the ‘Right To Face Your Accuser‘.

As time allows, i will add sub-tabs herein about these Natural Rights and Property. Thank you all for your support of and contributions to these pages.

Click HERE to read more about Property

Thank you Mark Passio

1 Thomas Jefferson - Claim

All Rights are Property, there are no exceptions. We find this idea about property in The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united State of America – 1776 wherein we read;

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, …”

‘i’ believe that life, liberty, happiness and even the “right to pursue” are all property.

‘i’ believe governments have but one legitimate purpose; to secure the Rights of man (property) . . . from another man that wishes to administrate that property without right.
‘i’ believe that corporations exist solely as extensions of said government and thus ultimately have an identical purpose to that of governments.

John Locke

Natural Law is Inherent, Pre-Existing and Self-Evident

A man or woman must have been harmed or their property injured for a violation of Natural Law to have taken place. Any ACTION which does not cause harm to a man or woman or injury to their property is a RIGHT.

Thought, words, actions, habits,Character, Destiny

 Sam Adams - chains

Whereas the current government was expressly instituted among men, not to cause harm to man, but for the purpose of securing rights (property), said government has no legitimate capacity to BAR man’s access to American common law.

~                   ~

==============================

West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. Barnette [319 U.S. 642]

“If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion, or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. If there are any circumstances which permit an exception, they do not now occur to us.” 

==============================