The “self-evident” purpose of government is:
“to secure these Rights” of man,
[The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America]
thus, ‘i’ believe in all prosecutions, that the identity of the man whose Rights the government seeks to secure must be made known to the accused because a man has firstly, the Right to settle all matters privately and secondly,
[a] ‘man’ has the Right to Face his Accuser
Said Property (Right) is secured by the 9th Article of the Bill of Rights, as well as by the
Word of the Almighty Creator of all things
CLICK the highlighted text above and below to follow the hyper-links
=============================
Acts 25:16 – To whom I answered, It is not the manner of the Romans to deliver any man to die, before that he which is accused have the accusers face to face, and have licence to answer for himself concerning the crime laid against him.
Act 24:8 Commanding his accusers to come unto thee: by examining of whom thyself mayest take knowledge of all these things, whereof we accuse him.
Act 24:10 Then Paul, after that the governor had beckoned unto him to speak, answered, Forasmuch as I know that thou hast been of many years a judge unto this nation, I do the more cheerfully answer for myself:
Act 24:16 And herein do I exercise myself, to have always a conscience void of offence toward God, and toward men.
Act 25:5 Let them therefore, said he, which among you are able, go down with me, and accuse this man, if there be any wickedness in him.
Act 25:8 While he answered for himself, Neither against the law of the Jews, neither against the temple, nor yet against Caesar, have I offended any thing at all.
Act 25:10 Then said Paul, I stand at Caesar’s judgment seat, where I ought to be judged: to the Jews have I done no wrong, as thou very well knowest.
Act 25:16 To whom I answered, It is not the manner of the Romans to deliver any man to die, before that he which is accused have the accusers face to face, and have licence to answer for himself concerning the crime laid against him.
========================
Cf. — Google Books search “if the plaintiff does not appear, no verdict may be given”
Titles To Look For
1750 – Giles Jacob – A New Law Dictionary Containing the Interpretation and Definition of Words (see p22 “nonsuit”)
1768 – Blackstone – Commentaries on the Laws of England – see page 376
1811 – Sir Thomas Edlyne Tomlins – The Law-dictionary: Explaining the Rise, Progress, and Present State, of the English Law
Act 23:35 I will hear thee, said he, when thine accusers are also come. And he commanded him to be kept in Herod’s judgment hall.
Redress ~ 4 ~ Dummies 
when Alaska and Hawaii became states of the United States of America, at the same time the United States lost two states. Yes they are different. the United States States in 1958 were Alaska, Hawaii, [Pourta misspelled Rico], Guam, Virgin islands, … The United States of America got two more, the United States lost two. Hawaii omnibus act Pub-L 86-624 and Alaska omnibus act… Also the search warrant is to be issued for the stolen or embezzled property, Vernon’s annotated Missouri rules 1 to 40 number 33.01 [about 1970’s or 1980] also; Pub law 85-864 National defense and education Aug 25, 1958, the States are islands plus Alaska. Alaska became a state in 1959. Hope this will help a man or woman. Thanks to Kalr Lentz and Gus Brenton and many others, for all the help you have been to this country.