It’s all about Property;
Common Law Rights are based in Natural Law which is considered to be so fundamental that it can not be the subject of legislation. Some of these rights include the ‘Right To Travel‘ and the ‘Right To Face Your Accuser‘.
As i find more time to research, i will add herein, more pages about these natural rights and Property.
Thank you all for your support of and contributions to these pages.
Click HERE to read more about Property
Thank you Mark Passio
All Rights are Property, there are no exceptions. We find this idea about property in The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united State of America – 1776 wherein we read;
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, …”
i believe that life, liberty, happiness and even the “right to pursue” are all property.
i believe governments have but one legitimate purpose; to help man protect, preserve and secure property … from another man that wishes to administrate that property without right.
I believe that corporations exist solely as extensions of government and thus have no greater purpose than that of governments themselves.
A man or woman must have been harmed or their property injured for a violation of Natural Law to have taken place. Any ACTION which does not cause harm to a man or woman or injury to their property is a RIGHT.
Uncle Remus taught the children well
Example: A man’s right to a relationship with his sons and daughters is as much a property as the sons and daughters. If this seems strange to you, it is because your education deprived you of the study of etymology. Click HERE for a great source of etymology.
Click HERE to join us on Tuesday, Wednesday and Saturday nights on Talkshoe
So, does a man’s Court follow the man and is it a common law court similar to the “King and his Court”
Is the system corrupt or do we just need to be man enough to gain access?
I believe when a man is present, so is his court, wherever he may be; if a man can hold, and not surrender his court to the legal society, then he shall have access to common law.
== example one:
Acts 25:16 is a great example of how common law is superior to codes or statutes.
Described in the book of Acts is your right to face your accuser — not just the witnesses..!!!
Think of how that might be important when your accuser is the State or IRS instead of Bob or Jim..?
== example two:
It is stated many times in the Bible that on the testimony of two or more witnesses shall a thing be established… likewise, it is expressly stated in the Constitution that a man can only be found guilty of the crime of treason upon the testimony of two man to the same act.
These two common law examples have their roots in the Bible yet are not written into the Bill of Rights, so how does [a] man access these rights..?
I believe these rights can only be accessed by [a] man who knows how to bring the law forward through the 9th Amendment.
Another common law right people have no idea about is forgiveness, which again, can only be accessed through the 9th amendment.
Whereas the current government was expressly instituted among us not to cause harm to man but for the purpose of securing rights (which is property), they have no legitimate capacity to BAR man’s access to man’s common law, but they may have a duty to test all [persons] that appear before them to insure imposter’s do not take advantage of the system created only for the benefit of man.