In an effort to find the common law thread that runs through all Law, ‘i’ve studied Statutes and Codes on and off for 15 years in an attempt to find a way out of the Administrative “LAW” venues we all get sucked into.

Joe (2)

Soon after ‘i’ began that study, ‘i’ realized LEGALESE and PERSON were the two most dangerous words used by the BAR society as TERMS to usurp the liberties and freedoms of mankind.

Thus 4 years ago, when ‘i’ began this website, ‘i’ decided to focus mostly on the common law as taught by Karl Lentz so that new folks reading and listening to the Talkshoe shows would not be confused as they began their journey into understanding the difference between the LEGALESE used in Courts, and the English language and Common Law Principles used by “man” and the pre Constitution settlers of America ;

This morning, someone in the Word Nerdz skype group asked me if he could push that conversation a little further outside of it’s common law boundaries in search of deeper answers and the following is my answer:

David,

Most folks herein are now well aware of what is and is not common to “man”‘ and thus ‘i’ no longer have much concern about confusing anyone . . in fact, looking at Statutes, Codes and other Legalese BS over the years is what ‘i’ did to uncover the common law thread that ran thru them . . ‘i’ however discovered most were void of standing in a common law venue and thus none had jurisdiction over “man” and his kind.

I believe it is the exercise of examining all things, similar to a Jury’s duty to “Try-All” facts/evidence, to be the best way for us all to grasp the underlying Doctrines of Law (that common thread) and to otherwise realize how void most LEGALESE Statutes and Codes are due to their being written in a language no common man can understand.

You need only look at New-Hampshire’s RSA 21 to see the full blend of Legalese BS injected into every Code, Statute or Ordinance created by the BAR society.

For instance, when you look at 21:2 Common Usage.Words and phrases shall be construed according to the common and approved usage of the language; but technical words and phrases, and such others as may have acquired a peculiar and appropriate meaning in law, shall be construed and understood according to such peculiar and appropriate meaning.
. . . it’s easy to perceive above  1) how the blend of English words and LEGAL TERMS has corrupted every statute as far as it’s applicability to ‘mankind’, and 2) how these Codes can be ONLY be administered against BAR qualified interpreters of said Code who actually are trained in the language of LEGALESE, and 3) how an American “man” can NOT be held accountable to a “LAW” which is written in a language he does not speak . . i.e. Chinese, Cantonese, Portuguese, Legalese etc . .

Another great example of this LEGALESE BS is 21:9 Person. – The word “person” may extend and be applied to bodies corporate and politic as well as to individuals.

Ask yourself –
1) where does this term PERSON “extend” from?
2) and what is meant by “individuals” ?

We [wo]man get in the deepest shit when we ASSume “individuals” means an individual “man” . . . a belief ‘i’ gave up years ago . . .  ‘i’ believe one of the “bodies” corporate and one of the “bodies” politic is what is meant by the terms “individuals” . . but then again, ‘i’ only trained in English and ‘i’ did fail that subject in my senior year of High School whereby ‘i’ did graduate only by the sympathy expressed by my English teacher after she told me she was well aware of my diligent efforts but that she felt even summer school would not help me . . . LOL

So  David . . YES . . let’r rip . . post what you wish so long as the conversation is always geared to discovering those ancient underlying principles of the law common to “mankind” that are still secured by the 9th Article of the US Bill of Rights  — “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

. . . and while we’re at it . . let’s all read the “The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
. . . that we may remember the only legit purpose of government is to secure the rights of “man”.

“. . . We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.– That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. . . . “

. . . finally, let us remember that without our (the Jury) consent  . . THEY have nothing